I usually refrain from offering up my two cents on these author/blogger debacles, unless they involve a friend, and only then to comfort said friend. But this change in the Goodreads ToS affects us all, some more than others, obviously. (I didn't have an author-related shelf on Goodreads. At least, it wasn't labeled as such. It's simply listed as "not in this lifetime", but the objective is the same as those who had "due to author" or "authors behaving badly" as their shelf titles.)
Anyway, I don't agree with Goodreads' handling of the situation. At all. If they'd at least given notice prior to doling out this twisted retribution, things might be a little different. I might not have been directly affected by this change, but I feel for those reviewers who lost hours of hard work in the form of honest reviews.
I agree with so many others before me that this move seems very pro-author. Goodreads has always been a site for readers, for book lovers, for people who just genuinely want to discuss books. We don't always like the same books, and for the most part, we've always been okay with that. There are some trolls out there who will never stop trying to convince us of this or that book's superiority, but there are far more honest-to-goodness book lovers on the site.
I didn't interact with authors all that much in the beginning on Goodreads, and to be honest, I still don't really. I've added some as friends, but for the most part, my interactions with authors, at least on Goodreads, has been very limited. I've only had a few comment on my reviews, and it's usually a pleasant experience. I called one a debut author in my review, and she politely pointed out that the book was actually her second novel. Another simply wanted to thank me for taking the time to read her book. Those interactions are nice. I've never had a not-nice situation with an author, luckily.
But to be truthful, I've always believed Goodreads should have remained a place for
readers to interact with each other. I understand that authors are readers, too, but their presence on Goodreads should remain as such. Especially when it seems that so many of them cannot take constructive criticism. It's unbelievable how some have treated our fellow reviewers. I daresay they'd think twice about attacking a reviewer from a major publication. But we're no one to them and so we're easy targets.
At first, I wasn't going to say or do anything. And then I read more and more of that
thread and got more and more incensed. It
does almost seem as if Goodreads is rewarding bad author behavior. I know, I know. They're cracking down on that, too, or so they say. I understand where Goodreads is coming from...they just want everyone to go back to their separate corners, call the fight over. Honestly, isn't that what we all want? But is
this change the way to go about it?
I like Goodreads...I didn't want to abandon ship after several great years. And I still haven't completely because they provide valuable content that, so far, isn't easily accessible all in one place. I know a lot of people are heading to one of Goodreads' competitors: LibraryThing, Shelfari, or BookLikes. I debated if any of these were right for me, or if should suck it up and hope that Goodreads would set things right. They've tried to make amends, but for some, it's too little, too late. In the end, I decided to make a new home for myself over at
BookLikes. I think it's the only of these sites that isn't at least partially owned by Amazon. In general, and from a purchasing standpoint, I like Amazon. But they have no place on a site made for
readers. Not when all they're attempting to do is collect data from us and line their own pockets. And definitely not when, because of their influence, a site I favor over all other social media has struck out against its very own users.
So, yeah, I've still got a profile on Goodreads. I may never fully leave it, simply because of the wealth of information it provides. I know I have a little while before my shelves finish importing over to BookLikes...something like 44 hours. And it'll take me awhile to familiarize myself with the general setup of BookLikes. I like it, but I don't love it. Not yet, anyway. But I'll keep playing with it. In the meantime, I've still got a foot planted firmly over there at Goodreads, despite everything. I can't help it...I feel like I've lost a good friend, but we're still trying to work on the friendship, ya know?
How are the rest of you coping with these changes? Were you affected? Are you completely abandoning Goodreads, or are you still feeling things out like me?
If you've moved to BookLikes, feel free to add me; I'm under
starryeyedjen.
Friday, September 27, 2013
{Event} Maggie Stiefvater Signing at Half Price Books + Giveaway
On Wednesday night, I was lucky enough to attend the Maggie Stiefvater signing and Q&A session at the flagship Half Price Books here in Dallas. For the last few releases of her books, I've pre-ordered Maggie-doodled copies from Fountain Bookstore, and the release of The Dream Thieves was no different. I own all of Maggie's books, though -- with the exception of the anthologies that her work appears in -- so I had quite a collection that wasn't signed. And, well, we can't have that.
Maggie read a scene from The Dream Thieves, with some help from the audience, and it made me want to read the book all over again. I've just about determined that it's my new favorite Maggie book, barely squeaking past The Scorpio Races on its way to the top.
In addition to the signing and reading, Maggie also took questions, and here are some things that were mentioned:
Hope you learned something new about one of my favorite authors! :) It was rough rearranging schedules and such so both Mendy and I could attend, so I want to give M a big shout-out for coming with. [She also wants Emily to know that she totally owes her for pretending to be her and getting her books signed so I didn't look like a total ass with like 20 books to get signed. =)]
So, I was totally thinking of you guys while I was there, and I picked up an extra signed copy of The Dream Thieves to give away to one lucky reader!
I hope you all get the chance to meet Maggie one day. She's so much fun and just so witty and weirdly charming. :D
Thanks for stopping by & happy reading!
Thursday, September 26, 2013
{Audiobook} Review: Rampant by Diana Peterfreund
Author: Diana Peterfreund
Narrator: Luci Christian Bell
Series: Killer Unicorns, book #1
Length: 11 hrs 44 mins
Publisher: HarperCollins
Publication Date: February 27, 2012
Source: purchased audio
Purchase: Amazon | Barnes & Noble | Audible
Sorry, couldn't help myself...that's how each chapter starts out: Wherein Astrid blah blah blah. It was repetitive but cute.
So, if you know anything about unicorns at all, you probably think a) that they're mythical and b) that they're these beautiful horses with a golden alicorn (that's what a unicorn's horn is officially called) atop its glorious head. And you'd be wrong in both cases, at least according to Astrid Llewelyn's mother.
I adored the snarktastic ambivalence Astrid showed her mother regarding her predilection to research and track down any mention of the supposed mythical beasts. But now that Astrid's boyfriend has been attacked by one of the beasts, it's up to Astrid to humor her mother and attend unicorn hunting school in Italy. Hey, an all expenses paid trip to "The Eternal City" doesn't sound so bad.
Astrid is a descendant of Alexander the Great, who famously tamed a unicorn the size of an elephant as his loyal steed. As such, it is her duty to protect humanity from the killer unicorns that are plaguing the world, attacking innocents and just generally wreaking havoc. At the cloisters, she meets other such descendants, some of which share her hesitancy to pick up the, erm, "family trade". Others are very gung ho about the whole business.
I think when I read the phrase "killer unicorns", my mind immediately assumed this would be a fantasy story, with a contemporary vibe. But it's more of the latter and less of the former. I'm not complaining...I had a lot of fun listening to this one, especially last night while I was stuck in traffic for two hours. But rather than focus on the fantastical, this novel focuses on the mythological aspect of unicorns, with special emphasis on the role of the virgin maiden and the magical and/or medicinal properties of the alicorn.
According to most lore, unicorns love them some virgins. By nature, unicorns are apparently ferocious, feral beasts unable to control their bloodlust, but for virgin maidens, they will lay aside their lack of impulse control and can become almost like pets. The Zhi in this novel are some such unicorns. The rest, however, have no compunctions about killing a girl, virginity intact or otherwise.
There's a rape plot in this novel that removed one of the girls from the ranks of the unicorn hunters, and for the most part, I thought it was handled in an acceptable manner. It wasn't written into the story just for the sake of added drama...the removal of choice in this instance played a big role in the girl's life as a hunter and as a young woman, and I thought it a valid storyline in addition to the actual hunting. I just would have preferred that in addition to the consequences for the girl, the notifying of the police, the clinic visit, etc., we could have seen what happened to the guy, who abruptly went missing after the ordeal. There's a reason for his absence, but I can't say for risk of spoilers. I haven't started the second book in this series, so I can't say that we don't see a resolution to this in it, but I'm still waiting for a confrontation, especially considering the circumstances regarding the deed.
Anyway, that aside, the book is fun. The narrator was great...she sounded like an actual teenager and her emphasis on the sarcasm was perfect. She had Astrid's snarky attitude down pat. The narrator employed a variety of voices for different characters and somehow made a gaggle of girls all sound different. My one complaint, though, would be that she made Astrid's love interest sound more like a surfer dude than the art history major he was by giving him such a laid-back voice.
Rampant is my first experience reading (listening to) a novel by Diana Peterfreund, though I'm also reading For Darkness Shows the Stars right now. I'm slightly more impressed by that book, but I'm definitely impressed by the author's writing in general. And the narrative voice in each book is totally unique to each story, further impressing me. I've already got the next book in each series queued up on my reading and listening devices...seriously regretting how long it took me to discover this author!
Thoughtful Thursdays: The Great Goodreads Debate
I usually refrain from offering up my two cents on these author/blogger debacles, unless they involve a friend, and only then to comfort said friend. But this change in the Goodreads ToS affects us all, some more than others, obviously. (I didn't have an author-related shelf on Goodreads. At least, it wasn't labeled as such. It's simply listed as "not in this lifetime", but the objective is the same as those who had "due to author" or "authors behaving badly" as their shelf titles.)
I agree with so many others before me that this move seems very pro-author. Goodreads has always been a site for readers, for book lovers, for people who just genuinely want to discuss books. We don't always like the same books, and for the most part, we've always been okay with that. There are some trolls out there who will never stop trying to convince us of this or that book's superiority, but there are far more honest-to-goodness book lovers on the site.
I didn't interact with authors all that much in the beginning on Goodreads, and to be honest, I still don't really. I've added some as friends, but for the most part, my interactions with authors, at least on Goodreads, has been very limited. I've only had a few comment on my reviews, and it's usually a pleasant experience. I called one a debut author in my review, and she politely pointed out that the book was actually her second novel. Another simply wanted to thank me for taking the time to read her book. Those interactions are nice. I've never had a not-nice situation with an author, luckily.
But to be truthful, I've always believed Goodreads should have remained a place for readers to interact with each other. I understand that authors are readers, too, but their presence on Goodreads should remain as such. Especially when it seems that so many of them cannot take constructive criticism. It's unbelievable how some have treated our fellow reviewers. I daresay they'd think twice about attacking a reviewer from a major publication. But we're no one to them and so we're easy targets.
At first, I wasn't going to say or do anything. And then I read more and more of that thread and got more and more incensed. It does almost seem as if Goodreads is rewarding bad author behavior. I know, I know. They're cracking down on that, too, or so they say. I understand where Goodreads is coming from...they just want everyone to go back to their separate corners, call the fight over. Honestly, isn't that what we all want? But is this change the way to go about it?
I like Goodreads...I didn't want to abandon ship after several great years. And I still haven't completely because they provide valuable content that, so far, isn't easily accessible all in one place. I know a lot of people are heading to one of Goodreads' competitors: LibraryThing, Shelfari, or BookLikes. I debated if any of these were right for me, or if should suck it up and hope that Goodreads would set things right. They've tried to make amends, but for some, it's too little, too late. In the end, I decided to make a new home for myself over at BookLikes. I think it's the only of these sites that isn't at least partially owned by Amazon. In general, and from a purchasing standpoint, I like Amazon. But they have no place on a site made for readers. Not when all they're attempting to do is collect data from us and line their own pockets. And definitely not when, because of their influence, a site I favor over all other social media has struck out against its very own users.
How are the rest of you coping with these changes? Were you affected? Are you completely abandoning Goodreads, or are you still feeling things out like me?
If you've moved to BookLikes, feel free to add me; I'm under starryeyedjen.
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Waiting on Wednesday: Of Metal and Wishes by Sarah Fine
"Waiting On" Wednesday is a weekly event, hosted by Jill at Breaking the Spine, that spotlights upcoming releases that we're eagerly anticipating.
This week's WoW selection is...
Author: Sarah Fine
Series: n/a
Publisher: Margaret K. McElderry
Publication Date: August 5, 2014
I loved Sanctum, and I've got the sequel to it coming up in a couple of weeks. But then Sarah Fine goes and writes this genie-like ghost story that just sounds so...so unbelievably awesome. I really hope this one is as good as it sounds. Too bad the release date is almost a year away!!! Waaaah.
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Top Ten Tuesday: Top Ten Best Sequels Ever
Top Ten Tuesday is hosted by the awesome ladies at The Broke and the Bookish. Apparently, they are overly fond of list-making and love to share their bookish lists with the rest of us book nerds. =) I'm game.
Um, it appears that even though I already knew I loved fantasy best of all, I really, really love fantasy sequels. :D
Oh, and honorable mention goes to these guys:
This is my first Top Ten Tuesday, so go easy on me...I tried to narrow it down to ten, I really did! =)
Current Giveaways
A Starry-Eyed Prize Pack!
Subscribe by Email
Follow Via Bloglovin
Follow Jen on Instagram
Jen's Currently Reading
Sabrina's Currently Reading
2019 Reading Challenge
Followers
Search This Blog
Ratings
Twitter
Quotes We ♥
Blog Archive
Labels
About Me
-
starryeyedjen
- I work with numbers by day, and I'm a mommy and avid reader by night. I'm a self-proclaimed Spreadsheet Queen, and I'll read anything you put in front of me. I seriously love all the books! And I adore audiobooks, too!
View my complete profile